That was the biggest one yet I think.
I did get a lot of feedback and adjusted to them in the matter of hours for almost a consecutive week. All in all I ended up producing 5 different version of the same sequence, correcting the main logo, fixing the colours on the go, altering the sound effects and so and so and so...
Long story short - some experience out of it on various software with a happy ending.
Anyway it started 'randomly' with this:
Then the second version, a simple fade-in:
Thirdly (is this even a word?) a not-so-simple fade-in with corrected colours:
SFX corrected (due to ambiguous meaning behind the spray-can sounds:
And the final, which got split into two sequences to represent the intro and the outro.
losing the lens caps since 2009
Showing posts with label Streetsport. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Streetsport. Show all posts
Saturday, January 21, 2012
Sunday, December 11, 2011
5d fieldtest /streetsport
Ok so I pulled together a quick edit of last week's Streetsport.
The edit - well, it is what it is, several clips put together. The film quality - well that's a different story.
To compare - the previous streetsport clip I put features almost exactly the same lighting conditions. The only difference was it was shot with 500d.
The difference is pretty significant. Again - good to have both. If the overheating issue is as serious as some say (I don't think a powerplant would overheat in this cold... guess will have to wait until it's warmer to actually find out) I could always swop bodies and leave the other one for a rest.
I had some doubts about the reason behind using DSLR for video recently. Is it because it's cheaper and easier to use than a professional video camera? Or do we actually 'feel the vibe' and enjoy the different/better quality these little babies produce?
There are already enough people arguing over the statement above so no reason for me to join the battle. Facts are better than opinions and the fact here is - due to large size of the sensor the DSLR (especially full-frame) can beat any camera in low light conditions.
Turns out it is appropriate, and worth it.
The edit - well, it is what it is, several clips put together. The film quality - well that's a different story.
To compare - the previous streetsport clip I put features almost exactly the same lighting conditions. The only difference was it was shot with 500d.
The difference is pretty significant. Again - good to have both. If the overheating issue is as serious as some say (I don't think a powerplant would overheat in this cold... guess will have to wait until it's warmer to actually find out) I could always swop bodies and leave the other one for a rest.
I had some doubts about the reason behind using DSLR for video recently. Is it because it's cheaper and easier to use than a professional video camera? Or do we actually 'feel the vibe' and enjoy the different/better quality these little babies produce?
There are already enough people arguing over the statement above so no reason for me to join the battle. Facts are better than opinions and the fact here is - due to large size of the sensor the DSLR (especially full-frame) can beat any camera in low light conditions.
Turns out it is appropriate, and worth it.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)